Khan v. Yale University

Summary

The court established that absolute immunity applies only to proceedings specifically authorized by law, adjudicatory application of public law, adequate procedural safeguards, and a sound public-policy basis for immunity. It held that Yale's disciplinary proceeding lacked sufficient safeguards because the complainant was not under oath, meaningful cross-examination and witness presentation were unavailable, counsel's participation was sharply restricted, and no adequate record was maintained. The court further concluded that alleged victims reporting sexual assault to proper higher-education authorities may receive qualified privilege, but the complaint's allegations of malice defeated that privilege at the motion-to-dismiss stage.