State v. Qayyum

Summary

The court affirmed the defendant’s convictions for conspiracy to sell narcotics and possession of narcotics with intent to sell. It declined to review the challenge to expert testimony because counsel did not object to the reformulated questions that formed the basis of the appellate claim. Assuming without deciding that evidence of the defendant’s lack of reportable wages was improperly admitted, the court held that the defendant failed to show that the evidence substantially affected the verdict.