State v. Qayyum

Summary

The court affirmed the defendant’s convictions for conspiracy to sell narcotics and possession of narcotics with intent to sell. It declined to review the challenge to expert testimony because the defendant failed to object to the reformulated questioning that formed the basis of his appellate claim, and it held that any error in admitting evidence of the defendant’s lack of reportable wages was harmless because the evidence had limited importance in the context of the state’s strong case.