State v. Gray

Summary

The court affirmed the defendant’s convictions, holding that his unpreserved due process claim failed because the record did not show that detaining three material witnesses affected the substance or reliability of their testimony. The court also held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting consistent and inconsistent portions of grand jury testimony and the related transcripts. The court declined to resolve whether witness detention could, in other circumstances, violate due process by coercing testimony.