State v. Gray

Summary

The court affirmed the defendant’s convictions, concluding that the detention of three reluctant eyewitnesses compelled their attendance but did not establish that their testimony was coerced or involuntary. Because the due process claim was unpreserved, the defendant failed to satisfy the applicable standard for review of an unpreserved constitutional claim. The court also held that the challenges to the admission of grand jury testimony were either unpreserved or properly rejected under the deferential abuse-of-discretion standard.