State v. Roy D. L.

Summary

The court affirmed the defendant's convictions after holding that the forensic interview was admissible under the medical-treatment exception, the prosecutor's closing remark did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial, and the evidence was sufficient to establish both the charged conduct and the required intent. The court also rejected the defendant's as-applied federal vagueness challenge because the statutes and their judicial interpretations gave fair notice that the conduct was criminally prohibited.