South Windsor v. Lanata

Summary

The court held that the Appellate Court erred by ordering a new trial on the defendant's zoning liability because that liability was no longer disputed. The remaining issue was factual and concerned how the defendant's legal impossibility defense affected the fines and remedies imposed for the violation. The case was remanded for further proceedings limited to damages and remedies. The court's opinion was unanimous, with all other justices concurring.