L. H.-S. v. N. B.

Summary

The court affirmed the denial of a civil protection order, holding that the governing statute requires an applicant to show both an actual fear for personal safety and that the fear was objectively reasonable. Applying the applicable standards of review, the court upheld the trial court’s factual findings and evidentiary rulings and declined to review the plaintiff’s unpreserved equal protection claim because the record lacked evidence of disparate impact.