State v. Turner

Summary

The court affirmed the conviction, holding that the defendant was not entitled to review of his unpreserved challenge to cell-phone mapping evidence under Golding, plain error, or supervisory authority. The trial court was not required to conduct a Porter hearing sua sponte, and the undeveloped record did not establish that the evidence was erroneously admitted or that any error was constitutionally significant. The court also declined to alter Connecticut's plain-error standard to measure clarity under the law existing at appellate review.