Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller

Summary

The court affirmed a one-year suspension imposed for multiple violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct. It held that denying the defendant's motion for articulation did not violate due process because the trial court's decision adequately explained its factual and legal conclusions and the appellate courts could order clarification if necessary. The court also adopted the trial court's reasoning rejecting the defendant's misconduct and discrimination-related claims.