Robert J. McKay v. Stuart L. Longman

Summary

The court affirmed judgments rejecting the plaintiff's challenge to a mortgage, upholding findings that two property transfers were fraudulent, and applying outsider reverse corporate veil piercing to four affiliated entities. The plaintiff lacked statutory standing because he was neither a party nor intended beneficiary of the mortgage and was outside the statute's protected interests. The court also recognized outsider reverse veil piercing in Connecticut and adopted a three-part test requiring proof of domination, consideration of harm to innocent stakeholders, and consideration of adequate legal remedies.