Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. Zbigniew S. Rozbicki

Summary

The court affirmed a four-year suspension imposed after finding that the attorney made repeated, baseless accusations of judicial bias, prejudice, and misconduct in violation of three professional-conduct rules. It held that the due process claim was unpreserved and failed constitutional review, that judicial inaction did not trigger claim or issue preclusion, and that the misconduct findings and sanction were adequately supported. No separate opinions were filed.