Supreme Court of Connecticut
Channing Real Estate, LLC v. Brian Gates
July 4, 2017326 Conn. 123
Summary
The court held that the parol evidence rule barred the defendant from relying on extrinsic evidence to vary the unambiguous, integrated terms of the six promissory notes. Because the defendant's liability was established as a matter of law and only damages remained, the proper remand was for a hearing in damages rather than a new trial. The court also held that the defendant lacked standing to pursue the CUTPA claim because the alleged injuries belonged to the limited liability company, not to him individually.