Andrea Micek-Holt, (estate of Edward W. Micek) v. Mary Papageorge

Summary

The court dismissed the Papageorges' writ of error because they were parties to the underlying action and could challenge the execution of ejectment through their pending direct appeal or an amended appeal. The court held that the circumstances did not create an exception to the rule limiting writs of error and therefore lacked jurisdiction. Because the writ was dismissed, the court did not decide whether filing it created an automatic appellate stay.