Supreme Court of Connecticut

Neighborhood Assn., Inc. v. Limberger

April 26, 2016

Summary

The dissent would conclude that an association’s standard foreclosure policy is an internal business operating procedure rather than a rule subject to the Common Interest Ownership Act’s notice-and-comment requirements. It reasons that the declaration already notified unit owners of the association’s foreclosure right, the statutory definition of a rule excludes policies set forth in the declaration, and the statutory rule-making provisions concern matters affecting traditional ownership or speech rights. The dissent therefore would reject the majority’s conclusion that the foreclosure policy had to be adopted as a rule.