Marjorie Hornung v. Robert Hornung — Zarella, J., dissenting

Summary

The dissent would reverse the financial orders because the $7.5 million lump-sum alimony award substantially exceeded the recipient's support needs, required the obligor to invade assets protected by the premarital agreement, and therefore functioned as an impermissible property distribution. It also would hold the amended premarital agreement unenforceable because the obligor failed to disclose his current income when the amendment was executed. The dissent would remand for a new hearing on financial matters. No separate opinions are included in the supplied record.