Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. Calco Construction & Development Co.

Summary

The court held that the trial court improperly entered judgment notwithstanding the verdict after failing to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s findings. The evidence supported findings that the defendants tortiously interfered with Landmark’s contractual relations, caused Landmark’s actual loss, acted with reckless indifference, and engaged in unfair or deceptive practices under CUTPA. The judgment was reversed, with instructions to enter judgment for Landmark consistent with the jury’s verdict and to conduct a hearing on punitive damages.