State of Connecticut v. Robert Troy Stephens

Summary

The court affirmed the revocation of the defendant's probation and his concurrent sentence of forty-two months of incarceration followed by eighteen months of special parole. It held that the overbreadth doctrine did not apply because the defendant challenged a probation condition on privacy grounds rather than under the First Amendment, and that the condition was not unconstitutionally vague as applied because the photographs clearly fell within its prohibited core. The court also held that sufficient evidence supported the probation-violation finding. No separate opinions were filed.