Supreme Court of Connecticut

Lawrence C. Sherman v. Eugene C. Ronco

January 26, 2010294 Conn. 548

Summary

The court held that the plaintiff’s amended claims against the former principal did not relate back to his timely original complaint because they alleged a materially different factual scenario and required different evidence. The amended claims therefore were barred by the applicable limitations period, and summary judgment for the defendant was proper. The court also clarified that relation-back questions are reviewed de novo.