In Re Kevin K.

Summary

The court held that the respondent's October 11 statement was admissible because the earlier advisement of rights, given two days before, satisfied the juvenile advisement statute under the totality of the circumstances. The court also held that the respondent was not in custody during the second interview, so the police had no constitutional duty to provide a new warning. The court reversed the Appellate Court and remanded with direction to affirm the trial court.