Reginald Keith Clark v. the People of the State of Colorado.

Summary

The court affirmed Clark’s conviction, holding that the trial court’s erroneous denial of a for-cause challenge to a racially biased juror was subject to harmless-error review because the juror did not serve and the court acted in good faith. The court also held that a juror’s recollection of a prior judge’s statement about deliberating until unanimity was not extraneous prejudicial information under CRE 606(b).