Mark L. Thompson and Rosalin Rogers, Petitioners v. Catlin Insurance Company (uk) Ltd., Respondent

Summary

The court affirmed the court of appeals’ conclusion that the district court reasonably construed the prior remand mandate when it considered unredacted invoices to calculate the insurer’s deductible fees and costs. It reversed the court of appeals on prejudgment interest, holding that money wrongfully withheld in a garnishment proceeding is subject to prejudgment interest under section 5-12-102(1)(a), even when the interest is requested during the garnishment proceeding. The case was remanded for further proceedings on prejudgment interest.