Carestream Health, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission, Defendant-Appellee and Public…

Summary

The court affirmed the district court’s judgment upholding the Commission’s interpretation of the tariff governing billing errors. It held that determining what billing-prevention measures are reasonable necessarily requires considering which errors were foreseeable, and that the Commission therefore acted within its authority. The court also held that Carestream lacked standing to challenge recovery of the remaining undercharge from the general customer base because it suffered no injury from that action.