Stephen Brett Ryals, Plaintiff-Appellee v. City of Englewood, Defend — Hood, J., Concurring in Part and Dissenting…

Summary

Justice Hood concurred that the matter involved mixed state and local concern but disagreed with the majority's preemption analysis. He would have held that the local residency ordinance was preempted by operational conflict because it materially impeded Colorado's comprehensive sex-offender-management scheme and was not authorized by the relevant registration statute. This opinion is a concurrence in part and dissent in part and therefore states no controlling holding.