C. Randel Lewis, Solely in His Capacity as Receiver, Petitioner v. Steve Taylor, Respondent — Gabriel, J., Dissenting

Summary

Justice Gabriel dissented from the majority's interpretation of the fraudulent-transfer limitations provision. He would construe the provision as an unambiguous statute of repose that extinguishes the underlying claim after the specified period and cannot be tolled or extended by agreement. The dissent concludes that the lower appellate division correctly held that the parties could not alter the statutory period. Chief Justice Rice and Justice Coats joined the dissent.