The People of the State of Colorado, in the Interest of Minor Child: S.n. v. S.n., A/k/a S.s., and — Coats, J…

Summary

Justice Coats dissented from the majority's treatment of summary judgment in a dependency and neglect adjudication involving alleged prospective harm. He would have affirmed the court of appeals' reversal of summary judgment because the parents' prior conduct alone could not resolve as a matter of law whether they would cause future harm, where the parents disputed the alleged risk. Justice Eid joined the dissent.