Supreme Court of Colorado

Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission and David Neslin

June 25, 20122012 Colo. LEXIS 458

Summary

Justice Hobbs dissented from the court's resolution of the citizens' challenge to the denial of a hearing on drilling permits near the Ru-Hson blast site. The dissent would have held that citizens should be allowed to present evidence and arguments when the relevant local government declines to seek a hearing on significant public-health, safety, and environmental concerns, because the Commission's contrary interpretation of its rules was arbitrary and capricious. The dissent would have vacated the Commission's action and remanded for a hearing before the permit decision.