California Supreme Court
The People, Plaintiff and Respondent v. Nathan Verdugo, Defendant and Appellant — Moreno, J., Concurring
August 2, 201050 Cal. 4th 263
Summary
The concurrence would have excluded the audio cassette of Mexican songs because its musical content had little or no informational value and posed a substantial risk of manipulating the jury's emotions during the penalty phase. The concurrence nevertheless agreed that admission of the cassette was harmless because only a few songs were apparently played, the presentation occupied a small part of the penalty-phase case, and its connection to permissible victim-impact evidence was tenuous. The concurrence also cautioned that artistic works created by victims should not be admitted without carefully weighing probative value against prejudicial emotional impact.