Curtis Dorsey v. State of Arkansas

Summary

The court affirmed the denial of Curtis Dorsey's postconviction petition, holding that he failed to establish ineffective assistance of counsel on any of his three preserved claims. The record showed that counsel cross-examined the relevant witnesses, the jury was informed about the distances and surroundings at the crime scene, and the proposed dashcam evidence would not establish prejudice in light of other evidence of flight. No separate opinions were filed.