Wayne Madole v. State of Arkansas

Summary

The court affirmed Madole’s convictions and sentences and granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw after conducting an Anders no-merit review and the required review of the record for prejudicial error. It held that the only preserved evidentiary challenge—to transcripts accompanying body-camera recordings—was frivolous, and that Madole’s pro se claims were either frivolous or unpreserved. No reversible error was found.