Vann Bragg v. State of Arkansas

Summary

The court affirmed Bragg’s convictions and sentences, holding that his challenge to the detective’s identification was not preserved because he raised a different objection below. It also rejected his hearsay, mistrial, prosecutorial-argument, and coram nobis claims, concluding that no abuse of discretion or sufficient prejudice was shown. The court cautioned prosecutors against seeking unauthorized postjudgment modifications to a codefendant’s conviction and sentence.