Jeffery Allen Workman v. State of Arkansas

Summary

The court affirmed Workman's convictions and consecutive sentences because his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence was not preserved. Although Workman made a directed-verdict motion at the close of the State's case, he failed to renew it after all evidence was presented, as required for appellate review. The court also conducted the required review for prejudicial error associated with his life sentence and found no reversible error.