The Travelers Indemnity Company and Stephen E. Goldman v. the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas

Summary

The court held that it had interlocutory jurisdiction to review the revocation of an out-of-state attorney’s pro hac vice admission because the order prevented the attorney from representing the party. It reversed that revocation because the circuit court imposed the drastic sanction without finding professional misconduct or providing notice and an opportunity to be heard. The court dismissed the challenge to excluding unvaccinated jurors because jury-composition rulings are not independently appealable in an interlocutory appeal.