John L. Drennan, Jr. v. State of Arkansas

Summary

The court affirmed the denial of Drennan’s postconviction petition, holding that he failed to show his trial counsel labored under an actual conflict of interest that affected the representation. Because no actual conflict was established, Drennan had to demonstrate deficient performance and resulting prejudice, but his allegations regarding additional questioning and uncalled witnesses were conclusory and undeveloped. The record also showed that counsel questioned Drennan’s mother about the relevant matters and objected to evidence concerning her for Drennan’s benefit as a defense witness.