Mark Robinson v. State of Arkansas

Summary

The court affirmed the denial of Robinson’s motion under Rule 60(k) to set aside his criminal judgment based on alleged fraud upon the court, holding that Rule 60 does not provide a vehicle for postconviction relief in a criminal case except for nunc pro tunc corrections. The court also denied Robinson’s motion to file a belated reply brief because of the lengthy delay and his failure to present a meritorious postconviction claim.