Danny Ray Henington v. State of Arkansas

Summary

The court denied Henington’s third petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court for coram nobis proceedings. It held that his challenges to expert testimony elicited by his own counsel, alleged ineffective assistance, failure to admonish the jury, and sufficiency of the evidence were not cognizable in coram nobis proceedings. The court also held that reasserting a prior challenge to the credibility of a Rule 404(b) witness constituted an abuse of the writ. No separate opinions were filed.