Conray Carroll v. State of Arkansas

Summary

The court affirmed the denial of Carroll's petition for leave to seek a writ of error coram nobis because he failed to allege a cognizable fundamental error, provide sufficient factual support, or demonstrate due diligence. His defective-arrest, actual-innocence, prosecutorial-misconduct, and coerced-plea claims either fell outside the writ's limited scope, could have been raised earlier, or did not establish legally sufficient coercion. A related administrative-procedure petition was moot, and his remaining motions were denied.