Anthony Randle v. W. Straughn

Summary

The court affirmed the dismissal of Anthony Randle’s habeas petition because his challenge to a felony information signed by a deputy prosecutor did not allege a facially invalid judgment or a jurisdictional defect cognizable in habeas proceedings. The court also held that the circuit court properly acted without requiring a response, conducted adequate fact-finding, and held no hearing because the petition stated no basis for habeas relief.