Supreme Court of Arkansas
Adam Davis, Jr. v. State of Arkansas
January 31, 2019566 S.W.3d 111
Summary
The court dismissed Davis's fourth petition seeking permission to pursue coram nobis relief because it repeated claims raised in earlier petitions and did not present sufficient facts showing extrinsic evidence or another recognized basis for the writ. The court held that alleged trial errors, disputes over competency-related rulings, dissatisfaction with the evidence presented, and unsupported assertions of nondisclosure could not support coram nobis relief. Davis's related motions were moot.