Richard Jordon Tarver v. State of Arkansas

Summary

The court affirmed Tarver's convictions and sentences, holding that his statements were properly admitted, substantial evidence supported the convictions, and none of his numerous challenges to evidentiary rulings, jury selection, clothing restrictions, charge overlap, or severance warranted relief. The court also held that several arguments were moot, abandoned, or unpreserved. No separate opinion was included in the record provided.