Parrish A. Dare v. Scott A. Frost — Baker, J., Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part

Summary

Justice Baker concurred with the decision not to impute additional income to Frost but disagreed with the majority's resolution of visitation and child-support issues. She would have reversed the visitation modification because the evidence did not establish a material change in circumstances, and would have required Frost's realized stock-portfolio profits to be included in calculating child support. No separate opinions are provided.