Zachary Holly, Appellant v. State of Arkansas, Appellee — Wood, J., Concurring

Summary

This concurrence found no prejudicial error in the record under the required review, including the circuit court's finding that the defendant was fit to proceed. It nevertheless expressed concern that the second mental evaluation was missing, counsel's review of the competency issues was unclear, and the adequacy of representation was not fully developed. Justice Wood hoped those issues would be developed and resolved in later postconviction proceedings.