Walter A. McCullough, Petitioner v. State of Arkansas, Respondent

Summary

The court denied McCullough’s second petition for permission to pursue a writ of error coram nobis. It held that his allegations of witness intimidation, undisclosed witnesses, and perjured testimony were conclusory and lacked factual substantiation showing that material favorable evidence was withheld or that disclosure would probably have changed the conviction. No separate opinions were filed.