Robert William Fischer, Petitioner v. State of Arkansas, Respondent

Summary

The court denied Fischer's motion for rule on clerk because his petition did not establish that his sentences were illegal on their face. Each ten-year sentence was within the statutory range for the six class C felony convictions, and consecutive service was statutorily authorized and therefore did not render the judgment facially illegal. Justice Hart, dissenting, would have first addressed whether the untimely tendering of the record deprived the court of jurisdiction.