Marilyn Curry Troutman, Appellant v. Ronald Troutman, Appellee — Womack, J., Dissenting

Summary

Justice Womack dissented from the majority's conclusion that the circuit court clearly erred in reducing Troutman's child-support obligation. He reasoned that the circuit court followed Administrative Order No. 10 by using Troutman's two preceding tax returns and properly found a material change in circumstances under the statutory income-change threshold. Justice Kemp, dissenting, likewise would have affirmed the circuit court because it correctly applied the statute and Administrative Order No. 10.