Gonder v. Kelley

Summary

The court affirmed the denial of Gonder's motions seeking reconsideration of his habeas petition and held that his asserted sentencing discrepancy, actual-innocence claim, and challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence did not establish a basis for habeas relief. It also held that a habeas hearing was not required because the motions lacked merit and that the cited civil-procedure and evidence rules did not require reconsideration. Motions filed in the appellate court were deemed moot.