Edward Carter, Petitioner v. State of Arkansas, Respondent

Summary

The court denied Carter’s third petition seeking permission to pursue coram nobis relief because his Brady allegations were conclusory, unsupported by specific proof that favorable evidence was suppressed, and insufficient to show a reasonable probability of a different result. The court also held that Carter’s challenges to witness credibility, evidentiary sufficiency, alleged false testimony, and trial errors were not cognizable in a coram nobis proceeding. His motion for leave to respond was moot.