Anarian Chad Jackson, Petitioner v. State of Arkansas, Respondent

Summary

The court denied Jackson’s sixth petition seeking permission to pursue coram nobis relief and denied his motions to supplement, concluding that his renewed claims concerning allegedly coerced testimony and suppressed evidence either repeated previously rejected allegations or relied on facts known at trial. The court also rejected his new claim based on an affidavit from a witness, finding the allegations implausible, contradicted by the record, and insufficient to establish material evidence withheld by the prosecution. Jackson’s remaining motions were deemed moot.