Tishaun Stenhouse, Petitioner v. State of Arkansas, Respondent

Summary

The court denied Stenhouse's application to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court for coram-nobis relief based on alleged suppression of exculpatory and impeachment evidence. It held that the recanted testimony and alleged evidence that the victim was armed would not have prevented the conviction or established a reasonable probability of a different verdict or sentence, and that the alleged plea agreements were discoverable through due diligence and were not shown to have caused the required prejudice.