Steven Victor Wertz, Appellant v. State of Arkansas, Appellee — Danielson, J., Dissenting

Summary

Justice Danielson's dissent would not resolve the motion to recall the mandate because the record was unclear whether the defendant had been properly convicted on two capital-murder counts and whether that created a double-jeopardy violation; he would order supplemental briefing. Justice Wood's dissent would deny the motion because the required mandate-recall factors were not satisfied and no extraordinary circumstances were shown.